Today marks six weeks to go before the hearing date. While I’m sure the time will fly by (after all, that means we’re over 50% of the way since leave was granted) living it up close and personal is always an interesting experience. Nothing like waiting months and years for something that is so fundamental to life.
Indeed, I often find myself reflecting upon the whole process, wondering if I would have been far wiser to have never pursued immigration in the first place. A look over at my spouse (being domestic right now, putting away laundry) assures me that the net outcome really is a good one, but absent that I seriously doubt I’d reach the same conclusion. Of course, underlying the court battle is my strong desire to prevail “on my own” – to basically not burden my spouse with this ongoing obligation to be responsible for me. While I don’t expect anything to happen, we never do plan for these sorts of things, do we?
The past week has been a good one overall, though. I pointed out the observation in my previous post that the PHSP would have overcome the medical officer’s objection to my attorney who thought that was an important point that he would incorporate into his memorandum (the memorandum is due on 18 September). I’ve also had the opportunity to interact with some other people who have been through the same process as me. One of them had a hearing yesterday (judgment reserved – but it was only 30 minutes, suggesting there really wasn’t much argument. Whether that is good or bad remains to be seen). The other won his case back in 2009 but was ultimately unable to successfully immigrate to Canada (from what I was told, this is because they couldn’t prove something that could only be determined once they had come to Canada.)
I took the past two days off as well. My spouse and I enjoyed a pair of wonderful days – late summer days, enjoying some time together – a rarity these days. It has given me a time to reflect and consider the nuances of this process. One thing I find myself wondering is if much of this “process” is really a mechanism by which Canadian Immigration can enshrine biases and discriminatory practices. Certainly both cases I learned about have suggested that this might be the case, but of course two cases do not prove a pattern, either.
Ironically, what helped me crystallize this thinking was a news article I read on The Huffington Post. It was the story of a child with Down’s Syndrome who was denied boarding on an American Airlines flight. The airline claimed the pilot was concerned about security. It made me realize that discrimination is so damned hard to prove precisely because it can be disguised in the clothing of “rational process”. Thus, they agree to allow someone into Canada but only if they can do something prior to granting permission that can only be done after they’ve been admitted to Canada. “So sorry, you are still not admissible to Canada.”
This passes an initial inspection as “due process” but fails to withstand scrutiny. What is particularly ironic is that immigration is about encouraging diversity – but only within a very limited range. There’s nothing wrong with having such a system, but it would seem to be disingenuous to dress it up in the guise of an equitable system.
There is a certain inherent hypocrisy in the system. While I had hoped that my case might serve to shine a bright light into the dismal innards of the system, the reality seems to be that this isn’t likely. The system is self-protecting. In my case, they will point to the fact that I can always enter the system through a different mechanism and thus avoid the possibility of examining the inherent bias in the system itself. While I can say that this is a shame for the process overall, I have selfish motivations here – I want the process to end.
Six weeks from today I’ll be allowed to watch them argue my fate. Some time after that I’ll learn the final outcome of my case.
- Canada – Skilled Worker immigration halted (jobmarketmonitor.com)
- Immigration suspects marriage a fraud (calgaryherald.com)
- Three Years (medicallyinadmissible.com)
- Would-be newcomers caught in legal quagmire (canada.com)
- Is Canada ‘a country of immigrants?’ (blogs.vancouversun.com)
- Immigrants face steep climb to success (business.financialpost.com)
- Canadians think immigration levels shouldn’t increase:poll (vancouversun.com)